|
0 registered (),
2
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
412 Members
34 Forums
6711 Topics
85050 Posts
Max Online: 118 @ 11/15/06 04:36 PM
|
|
|
#147148 - 07/28/10 04:20 PM
Re: Now this could be controversial- Animals
[Re: Fosse4]
|
Member
Registered: 05/17/04
Posts: 18905
Loc: Queensland
|
There has been a small lobby who, for years, have protested against horseracing. Small concessions have been made in regard to the treatment of the horses (eg, excessive whipping is banned), but I can't see too much more success for them, given the widespread popularity of the sport.
_________________________
There ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk - Tom Waits
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#147151 - 07/29/10 02:33 AM
Re: Now this could be controversial- Animals
[Re: Maggie]
|
Member
Registered: 06/23/10
Posts: 48
Loc: The Lucky Country
|
Another case of Doo Gooooders riding thier moral steeds interfering in other peoples lives! All so they can get that warm and fuzzy rush like a junkie.
Supply and demand, If no one watched these fights bullfighting would not exist! So a Ban is anti capitolist or communist in nature! I dont like bullfighting myself but to ban it is illogical and just plain stupid but then again stupidity is rewarded these days. Just my opinion
_________________________
Reach out and Touch someone
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#147155 - 07/29/10 05:49 AM
Re: Now this could be controversial- Animals
[Re: Fosse4]
|
Member
Registered: 05/17/04
Posts: 18905
Loc: Queensland
|
Maggie, I wasn't for a moment comparing bullfighting to horseracing. I was just stating the fact that bans had also been implemented there. I'm no fan of either one, to be honest.
This sort of reminds me of the Olympics in the early part of the 20th Century. I can't, off the top of my head remember which Olympiad, but St. Louis is ringing a bell, but in the shooting events, for the moving target events, they used LIVE PIGEONS! That only lasted one Games, as common sense took over and they used clay pigeons from then on.
_________________________
There ain't no devil, there's just God when he's drunk - Tom Waits
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#147176 - 07/29/10 05:50 PM
Re: Now this could be controversial- Animals
[Re: Maggie]
|
Member
Registered: 06/23/10
Posts: 48
Loc: The Lucky Country
|
Even clay pigeons is no longer pc They must be refered to as "Clay Targets" What a crock of S
_________________________
Reach out and Touch someone
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#147449 - 08/15/10 02:55 AM
Re: Now this could be controversial- Animals
[Re: Fosse4]
|
Member
Registered: 12/18/08
Posts: 362
Loc: Queensland
|
Didn't you know? Sporting shooters are a bunch of rednecks. If you use an animal name to refer to a target - they might go out and start shooting innocent birds! They're all barbarians these shooters!
While we're at it, lets ban fishing! I mean we don't have to eat fish and depopulate our waterways. You could hurt the ecology of the area.
And domestic fires? We've got to save the trees! Without trees global warming will kill us all! You shouldn't be allowed to light a fire because in gathering the wood you destroy a centipede's home!
Don't get me started on that monstrous flyspray either...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#147454 - 08/15/10 09:15 AM
Re: Now this could be controversial- Animals
[Re: Nitro]
|
Member
Registered: 05/17/04
Posts: 5732
Loc: Leicester, UK
|
Setting todays Chat Quiz, I came across a quote from Charlton Heston President of the NRA and staunch advocate of Gun Laws (if that's not contradictory) Quote "...the God fearing, law-abiding, Caucasian, middle-class Protestant - or even worse, evangelical Christian, Midwestern or Southern - or even worse, rural, apparently straight - or even worse, admitted heterosexuals, gun-owning - or even worse, NRA-card-carrying, average working stiff - or even worse, male working stiff - because, not only don’t you count, you are a down-right obstacle to social progress. Your voice deserves a lower decibel level, your opinion is less enlightened, your media access is insignificant, and frankly, mister, you need to wake up, wise up, and learn a little something from your new-America and until you do, would you mind shutting up? 'Bout sums it up!
_________________________
Knowing where to look is 99% of the answer!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#147457 - 08/15/10 11:28 AM
Re: Now this could be controversial- Animals
[Re: Fosse4]
|
Member
Registered: 09/02/06
Posts: 5
|
I beg to differ about racehorses. Some are treated well but many are not and many end their lives in misery having been sold on to unscrupulous or ignorant people who don't know how to look after a thoroughbred horse. One Grand National winner was found living on kitchen scraps tied to a shed at the bottom of a block of flats - he was "lucky", he was rescued by a racehorse charity and ended his days hunting and being very well cared for.
Many are also very difficult to rehabilitate because of having physical problems from being ridden at too young an age and psychological problems from not being allowed to develop properly as part of a herd for the same reason. Why do they keep running after they've unseated a rider? They're herd animals and instinct tells them to run if everyone else is doing so! Having said that, I think many horses DO enjoy their jobs and those that ARE well cared for can lead good lives and I would still prefer horse racing over bull-fighting any day if I had to choose.
John, you said you wanted more forum participation! Here I am...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#147461 - 08/15/10 05:55 PM
Re: Now this could be controversial- Animals
[Re: Mink]
|
User
Member
Registered: 09/10/05
Posts: 4767
Loc: Hove, actually
|
I came across a quote from Charlton Heston President of the NRA and staunch advocate of Gun Laws (if that's not contradictory) I think you would find that Charlton Heston, as NRA President, was arguing against proposed new gun laws and media hysteria about the availability of guns in the USA, rather than for them. He was a staunch advocate of the second amendment (the right to bear arms) In addition the quotation is taken out of context. You neglect to mention that it he was addressing the issue of "a culture war he said was being conducted by a generation of media, educators, entertainers, and politicians against" the people mentioned in the quotation The quoted speech might at first appear to be gibberish but, in fact, he seems to be going down the list from the most socially acceptable gun owner to the least, as perceived by his "enemies". The full speech can be found hereThe full paragraph from which the original quote is taken is: Rank-and-file Americans wake up every morning, increasingly bewildered and confused at why their views make them lesser citizens. After enough breakfast-table TV hyping tattooed sex-slaves on the next Rikki Lake, enough gun-glutted movies and tabloid shows, enough revisionist history books and prime-time ridicule of religion, enough of the TV anchor who cocks her head, clucks her tongue and sighs about guns causing crime and finally the message gets through: Heaven help the God-fearing, law-abiding, Caucasian, middle class, Protestant, or—even worse— admitted heterosexual, gun-owning or—even worse—NRA-card-carrying, average working stiff, or—even worse—male working stiff, because not only don’t you count, you’re a downright obstacle to social progress. Your tax dollars may be just as delightfully green as you hand them over, but your voice deserves a lower decibel level, your opinion is less enlightened, your media access is insignificant. And frankly, mister, you need to wake up, wise up and learn a little something about your new America… and until you do, would you mind shutting up?I might not agree with the guy's opinions but I think he should at least be quoted in context
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#147470 - 08/16/10 03:16 AM
Re: Now this could be controversial- Animals
[Re: Tommy_Coyne]
|
Member
Registered: 06/23/10
Posts: 48
Loc: The Lucky Country
|
Guns are power pure and simple!
When citizens are stripped of the right to bear arms they are stripped of thier power, stripped of thier freedom and become mere subjects of an all powerfull government.
It should in a FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY be the people who hold the power not the government. The vote is how free citizens decide what go"s but it is the firearm in free citizens hands that GUARANTEE'S that vote
History has proven this time and time again Hitler disarmed his people Stalin disarmed his people Pol Pot disarmed his people they enslaved the people, stripped them of thier rights and opened the gates of HELL!
_________________________
Reach out and Touch someone
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|